Thus, although the public has a qualified right of access to civil court proceedings and records, the trial court may limit this right when there is a compelling countervailing public interest and closure of the court proceedings or sealing of documents is required to protect such countervailing public interests. subject to reasonable limitations imposed in the interest of the fair administration of justice or for other compelling public purposes. He open courts provision of Article I, Section 18 of the North Carolina Constitution guarantees a qualified right on the part of the public to attend civil court proceedings. The North Carolina Constitution confers a qualified right of access to civil court proceedings and records. Supreme Court precedent on the First Amendment presumption of access in criminal cases-i.e., a heightened standard of scrutiny in favor of disclosure absent a compelling public interest. In a civil right of access context, the North Carolina Supreme Court has applied by analogy U.S. Tips for covering courts in the jurisdictionĬ. Cameras and other technology in the courtroomĬ. Interests often cited in opposing a presumption of accessī. Media standing to challenge third-party gag ordersĪ. Restrictions on participants in litigationĪ. Prohibitions on photographing or identifying juvenilesĮ. Juror identities, questionnaires and other recordsĭ. Warrants, wiretaps and related materialsī. Obtaining review of initial court decisionsĭ. Procedure for requesting access in civil mattersĭ. Procedure for requesting access in criminal casesĬ. Procedure for asserting right of access to proceedings and recordsī. Introduction: Access rights in the jurisdiction Skip over table of contents to continue reading article Table of contents for North Carolina
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |